Toxic Masculinity: What Society Says to Men | Helly Shah

Helly Shah’s Spoken Word poem, “What Society Says to Men” conveys a feminist outlook on the ways that men have been conditioned and wrongfully stereotyped by culture for generation after generation. Being a feminist does not entail believing that one gender is superior to the other, but rather fighting for every gender to have equal rights and opportunities. Shah displays this poignantly, and even opens her poem by saying that while she “always felt like men were born with sense of entitlement to this world” (0:36), she learned that just as women are weighed down by the chackles of prejudice, misogyny, bigotry, patriarchy, Chauvinism, and “ten other jargons” (0:30), men are chackled with emotional suppression, societal ignorance, toxic masculinity, and cultural pressures that stem from problematic gender roles and damaging stereotypes. 

Shah recites the five things that society sermonizes to men from the day they are born to the day that they die. These five issues that society says to men who try to grow up are:

 

1.     MEN DON’T CRY

a.     Because women possess monopoly over tears, not men

b.     Because society stresses that emotion is just a cover up for weakness, and men ‘aren’t supposed to be vulnerable’

c.     Shah states, “When Kevin failed the 5^th grade, he didn’t cry. When Kevin’s mother left him, he didn’t cry. When Kevin’s girlfriend died, he didn’t cry. When Kevin committed suicide, he wondered who would cry.” (1:00)

d.     These stereotypes of masculinity harm boys from an incredibly young age, and make them learn the mental effects of having to prove one’s masculinity while suppressing their emotions to show no signs of ‘weakness’

2.     ALL MEN ARE DOGS

a.     Society paints men to be preying animals, looking for their next woman to lie, cheat, rape, harass, or betray (1:15)

b.    Because all it takes is the action of one bad individual to define an entire gender

c.     “The loyalty, faithfulness, and everything wonderful that is a man’s best friend is shoved under the carpet because that one dog couldn’t stop humping” (1:27)

3.     BE A MAN

a.     Men are pressured and told to ‘be a man’ by the father that left him, by the uncle that preys on underage girls

b.     If this is the standard that we are showcasing to boys and young men, how does our culture expect them to grow up when it is already so arduous to be a teenager in the first place?

4.     REAL MEN FINISH LAST

a.     Masculinity is a word, humanity is another (2:15)

b.    Toxic masculinity and societal pressure teach men that you will never get any pleasure in life unless you are an asshole and treat women like trash

5.     MEN WILL BE MEN

a.     “A man should be a man when he sheds his first tear, when he cries his eyes out… when his father comes home drunk and raises his hand… when his daughter brings home a boy… when he is in bed with the woman he loves, cherishes, and appreciates.” (2:34–2:57)

b.    Before anything else, a man is a human, too

 

Shah is standing for humanity and not taking sides or separating genders and agendas. Men can be and are victims, too. They are victims of generational societal norms and gender misconceptions. As a society, we have to unlearn the generations of conditioning, gender roles and the toxic masculinity that is ingrained into society, and instead opt for kindness, empathy, understanding and liberation from the shackles of these norms and expectations that are placed upon men. 

Works cited

"What Society Says To Men- Helly Shah." YouTube, uploaded by Helly Shah, 2020, youtu.be/HL6-6zdGDxU .

The Wine Not the Label: How Schitt's Creek Got Bisexuality Representation Right

"Our show, at its core, is about the transformational effects of love and acceptance and that is something we need more of now than we've ever needed before," said Dan Levy, as he accepted the 2020 Emmy Award for Outstanding Comedy Series for the television show Schitt’s Creek (which he is the co-creator, co-writer, and actor for) on which he plays David Rose, an openly pansexual character. Schitt’s Creek is celebrated for its inclusivity and positive representations of LGBTQ+ relationships, which is something that is few and far between throughout pop culture and media. Particularly, the show’s representation of the “bi umbrella,” pansexuality (male bisexuality specifically), and its spectrum is something to celebrate.

Bisexuality implies a sexual identification with both women and men (Shaw, Lee, 2019). Likewise, the term ‘bi’ or ‘bisexual’ is an “umbrella term umbrella term used to describe a romantic and/or sexual orientation towards more than one gender” (Stonewall, 2020), and ultimately covers a broad range of identities. Thus, the term of the bi+ umbrella encompasses identities and attractions such as pansexual, demisexual, polysexual, omnisexual, and more!

Office of LGBTQIA Education & Engagement

 

Throughout the eras of media (particularly film and television), the portrayal of bisexual relationships have been largely negative, misrepresented, and often reflect the cultural intolerance of queer individuals. According to GLAAD’s Where We Are On TV, “gay, lesbian, or bisexual characters make up almost 8% of television characters” (2019). Furthermore, most of the LGBTQ+ relationships that are in popular media are represented through exploitative stereotypes and one-dimensional misconceptions. 

 

For example, bisexual and gay men are often portrayed as bold, promiscuous, flamboyant, flashy caricatures (while bisexual women and lesbians are frequently typecast to be uptight and masculine). And while bisexual men are often erased from mass media, they are almost never forgotten when sexually transmitted diseases are involved (Alexander, 2011), as the bias, fear and homophobia rising from the misconception of AIDS remains prevalent even today. These “biases stemming from lack of knowledge, homophobia, and inaccurate portrayals in the media have left bisexual individuals fighting to reclaim their own narrative” (Jones, 2020), as these one-dimensional labels and prejudices have greatly harmed the depictions of LGBTQ+ individuals and their relationships through pop culture.

 

Thus, it certainly was a groundbreaking moment in television when David Rose eloquently expressed the fluidity of his sexuality by metaphorically explaining that he is fond of a very wide variety of wine and drinking experiences, ultimately saying, “I like the wine, not the label.” With this analogy, David expresses what it means to be pansexual, which is often misconstrued with being bisexual (although pansexuality remains fixed under the “bi umbrella”). Additionally, while the show concludes with David’s character marrying his love interest Patrick (a gay man), this does not disaffirm David’s pansexuality, but rather reaffirms his fluidity while allowing the audience to understand and embrace the wide and proud spectrum of David’s sexuality. 

 

TheShirtList.com

 

Likewise, it is important to note that David’s relationship with Patrick is addressed and positively greeted with absolutely zero questions or raised eyebrows, but full acceptance from all characters involved. Throughout the show, their relationship is treated like any heterosexual union, which is unheard of in popular media. For many other shows that hold a similar narrative to Schitt’s Creek, David and Patrick’s relationship would have been merely cast aside with the brand of a ‘gay relationship,’ apart from the show’s main storyline. Instead, David and Patrick are front and center, their wedding closes the series out, and their relationship is not labelled, but rather a natural representation of love between two individuals who don’t have to face bias or prejudice. 

 

The TV Guide

When speaking on LGBTQ+ representation, Dr. Nora Madison said that "for bisexuals specifically, media representation has a long history of portraying us negatively," (CBS News), as the many derogatory stigmas of bisexuality reflect the ignorant, hypersexualized, and uneducated attitudes that popular, mainstream media holds over bisexuality and many other sexualities that are negatively represented.

Thus, the affirmative representation of LGBTQ+ relationships that Schitt’s Creek has established has been both vital and beneficial for young people and a template for other television shows to follow. Likewise, by having a positive portrayal on TV, it reduces the stigma and allows for audiences to become more empathetic and understanding toward LGBTQ+ relationships.  Although bisexual representations have surely evolved throughout history from its exploitive and problematic origins, it is evident that there is still a long way to go. However, shows like Schitt’s Creek are certainly pointing to the right direction, and we could hope to get more accurate and positive representations of bisexuality throughout popular media 

 

 

Works cited

 

Alexander, Jonathan. “Bisexuality in the Media: A Digital Roundtable.” Journal of Bisexuality, vol. 7, no. 1-2, 2007, pp. 113–24, doi.org/10.1300/J159v07n01_07. 

 

Jones, Zoe C. “Where Does the Media’s Portrayal of Bisexuality Go From Here?” CBS News, 2020, cbsnews.com/news/bi-visibility-day-media-bisexuality-portrayal/.

 

 

Gates, Gary J. “How Many People are Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender?” Williams Institute, UCLA  School of Law, 2011, williamsinstitute.law.ucla.edu/publications/how-many-people-lgbt/.

 

GLAAD, “Where We Are on TV (2019–2020). GLAAD Media Institute, 2020.

 

“List of LGBQT+ Terms.” Stonewall, 2020, www.stonewall.org.uk/list-lgbtq-terms .

 

“Schitt’s Creek – The Wine Not the Label.” YouTube, uploaded by Schitt’s Creek, 2016, https://youtu.be/gdcmhvLaNUs .

 

Shaw, Susan M. Lee, Janet. “Gendered Voices Feminist Visions: Classic and Contemporary Readings” Oxford University Press, vol. 7, 2019, p. 282.

 

 

 

Gentle Parenting to Combat Toxic Masculinity

 

How are you combating toxic masculinity in your household?

Healthy Masculinity: Redefining What It Means to Be Masculine

 Healthy Masculinity: Redefining What It Means to Be Masculine by Taneasha White, published in PsychCentral on November 2, 2021. 

"It’s true that the way we’ve consistently seen masculinity expressed is often connected to harm — like sexual assault, domestic violence rates, or homophobia — but there is also room to talk about what’s been missing from the conversation: healthy expressions of masculinity."

Communication in Male Friendship and Its Shortcomings

 *trigger warning for s-xual assault and r-pe.

In 2016, Donald Trump was elected president. All I could think about was the grotesque audio of him speaking to Billy Bush about women and his sexual conquests with them: “You know I’m automatically attracted to beautiful — I just start kissing them. It’s like a magnet. Just kiss. I don’t even wait.  And when you’re a star, they let you do it. You can do anything. Grab them by the p---y. You can do anything” (2016). Not once does Bush object to the lewd comments being made, and when this audio was leaked, many dismissed the actions on account of simple “locker-room” talk. Society has not only rationalized but excused men’s objectification of and domination over the female body in casual conversation because “boys will be boys.” In her section on masculinity, Susan Shaw and Janet Lee write “In mainstream contemporary U.S. society, the “regimes of truth” associated with masculinity… revolve around potent sexuality and an affinity for violence: the machismo element. Machismo involves breaking rules, sexual potency contextualized in the blending of sex and violence, and contempt for women and femininity (misogyny)” (104). When men are not held accountable and continuously rewarded for, or in spite of, their detrimental socialized masculine qualities, they are emboldened to continue with their ways, growing more comfortable and powerful in their privilege. 

Your Friends and Neighbors, a 1998 film, explores this masculinity and how it is referenced in conversations between men. In the film, three men discuss their sexual lives while three women do the same, however, what we're left with is a brutal and tormented depiction of sexual isolation. One of the toughest scenes to watch exemplifies this, as one character Cary, the most sexually deviant who consistently focuses on sex and is verbally violent to the women he wants to have sex with, describes his “best f-ck,” a question frequently asked throughout the movie. He details a time in his senior year of high school when he and his male friends gang- r-ped a boy named Tommy, though Cary claims that as he went last, he felt Tommy and him share a special connection. His two “friends” listening to this story, though shocked, do not express any outrage or disgust at Cary’s actions, simply describing it as an incredible story. The film, written and directed by Neil LaBute, showcases the toxic machismo ideals in men and how freely they are expressed amongst other men. Cary is never held accountable and is actually praised for his despicable notions of sex and dominance over women, and even men in regards to sex. While the film does operate as a hyperbolic immortality tale, it isn’t too hard to suspend your disbelief about the disturbing ways men can communicate about women and sexual politics. 

But what about the general state of male communication? What do men talk about and how do they talk to each other? Well, I decided to get into the personal and ask my boyfriend some questions about what he's observed from his own experiences with male friends. He stated “I feel like a lot of male friendships in my eyes don’t involve a lot of meta-analyses. They don’t talk about their relationship, they just kind of exist together and I feel like, without that kind of space to talk and set boundaries, it feels like it's almost devoid of a safe place to talk. You don’t wanna start that conversation because of the toxic masculinity fear of talking about emotions, for me, that feels present. That looming feeling of ‘don’t step out of line’.”

 If men don’t feel comfortable speaking about anything confrontational for fear of being ostracized by those who uphold the status quo, then they simply won’t and important conversations will be left unsaid. And this is a tremendous shame. Men, for the sake of themselves and greater society, should be able to engage in genuine and honest friendships that challenge them to be better people. Men deserve healthy friendships. 

In an article for The Atlantic titled The Power of Intimacy in Male Friendships, Julie Beck interviews two friends to discuss the significance of their relationship. In one installment, Mitchell talks about his friendship with another man named Judo, stating: “I get so much out of our friendship because I am challenged by the contents of our conversation; I’m challenged by the way you choose to think about a problem. I’m challenged by the things that you expose me to.” To challenge your friends, not only in their sexual politics but in everyday life, enriches both people's capacity for empathy and human connection. But, men are not taught to do this. This sort of relationship is not being cultivated or encouraged among young men and what we are left with is a man like Donald Trump, accused of 26 counts of sexual misconduct, being elected President of the United States. 

Why does society choose to excuse disturbing male behavior in conversations with other men when instead we could be accentuating accountability and championing positive male friendships. This emphasizes why feminism is not solely meant to benefit women, but also men, creating a world where women are safe to live, and men are safe to talk. 

Sources

Trump recorded having extremely lewd conversation about women in 2005

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/trump-recorded-having-extremely-lewd-conversation-about-women-in-2005/2016/10/07/3b9ce776-8cb4-11e6-bf8a-3d26847eeed4_story.html

How 1 Friend Can Change the Course of Your Life

https://www.theatlantic.com/family/archive/2021/06/intimacy-male-friendship-change-life/619290/

The 26 women who have accused Trump of sexual misconduct

https://www.businessinsider.com/women-accused-trump-sexual-misconduct-list-2017-12

Gendered Voices, Feminist Visions: Classic and Contemporary Readings

Susan M. Shaw,  Janet Lee

Successful Manhood

    “What do you do?”, “What career do you have?” these questions are some of the first things asked when people are introduced to each other, especially men.  The competitive nature of industrialized, individualistic culture in America has created an unobtainable standard of “success”.  But what is success if you aren’t happy? 

    For men, their masculinity is almost exclusively their career.  The breadwinner expectation has evolved into a constant climb to the top of the social hierarchy.  This has led to 80-hour work weeks, high divorce rates, and high rates of male suicides.  Men are now literally and metaphorically killing themselves to be better than the next guy all in order to be “successful”.

    What if men flipped the script? What if the first thing people asked each other after being introduced was not “so, what do you do?” but rather “are you happy?”.  In my opinion, that should be the measure of success.  If a man can come home to either his family, or if he chooses to be single, and be truly happy, I believe that men’s mental health and relational health would be much healthier.  If you are a man, I will leave you with this thought: Does being a successful man mean being successful on other’s terms or on your own?

No Homo Bro

    “But no homo” uttered the teenage boy after expressing his gratitude towards his male friend for being there for him after he lost both his parents.  After all this boy has been through, he finally became vulnerable enough to express his feelings towards his friend, but he still has a seed inside of him that any acknowledgment of emotion would mean that he has is attracted to men.  

    Modern men face a treacherous outcome in their same sex relationships.  Feelings are feminized and misunderstood to mean that the man expressing the feelings has a sexual attraction to the other. This has left men with stoic, cold, and shallow friendships with other men.  Furthermore, the phrase “no homo” deepens the segregation between heterosexual and homosexual men.

    The taboo that straight men have created around homosexuality has not only severed their own relationships with themselves but also ousted homosexual men.  When a man must assert that he does not sexual preference towards other men due to one action or another, it creates a sharp divide.  In the man’s mind, after saying a comment like “no homo”, it is translated as oh no I am not gay, that would be a bad thing and I am not that.  What happens when heterosexual men meet a homosexual man? To me, it seems that there would be a tension as if the homosexual man is completely unlike them and somehow a “bad” or “weird” man.  When saying such as “no homo” are eliminated from men’s verbiage, maybe it will lay the ground for authentic man to man friendships and furthermore, create a climate for inclusivity of homosexual men into heterosexual men’s circles.  

Be a MAN

    Have you ever heard this expression before?  Maybe you have heard it said to a friend, a son, a boyfriend...heck, maybe you have even said it yourself.  Being told to be “a man” materializes the societal stereotypes of manhood including, but not limited to, being tough, strong, successful, smart, stoic, and the breadwinner.  However, do we ever stop and ask ourselves what happens to men when this phrase is uttered?  

    For centuries, men have been put in this so-called “man box”.  Inside of this box is everything a man “should” be, at least according to the historical archetypes.  In books, movies, and advertisements, men are portrayed as dominant, unrelenting, unemotional, athletic figures.  When a man’s life is constantly inundated with these images from the popular media, it is difficult to deter these expectations of who he should be and live up to be.  

    Furthermore, the phrase “be a man” further suggests the firm dichotomy between male and female, implying that there is no grey area.  The firmness of the perceived boundary between feminine and masculine determines the polarization of the two.  Men are more drawn to traditionally masculine qualities as means to solidify their identity as a man. It is my opinion that men should learn at a young age that being a man doesn’t hold them to only masculine characteristics, instead when men learn to embrace their femininity they are even more “manly”.  Imagine a world where men are not driven strictly to be what the man box tells them they should be but rather who they are authentically and holistically. 

Surveilling the Male Body

Typically when we hear the word “objectification,” we think of the objectification and sexualization of women in the media. From any major fashion advertisement, like the Alexander Wang ad below, to Telenovelas and soap operas, women’s bodies are constructed as a site for the viewing and pleasure of others. We have seen the negative impacts of objectification on women, like the growing number of women diagnosed with an eating disorder or exhibiting signs of disordered eating. But, with such a high focus on the objectification of women, have we lost sight of the prevalence of the objectification of men’s bodies, too? 

Especially with the growing use of social media among both genders, the objectification of men is at an all-time high. Through the study of male body builders on Instagram, it was found that these men objectify their bodies in order to reach an aesthetic ideal, one that is frequently portrayed on social media. Men, like women, are learning to value their bodies based on the pleasure and viewing of other people. But, if the objectification of men is truly on the rise, why is it that we don’t hear as much about it as we do of women? It seems to me that we are stuck in the mindset that women are objectified and men do the objectifying. How could it be the other way around? I think our society needs to reevaluate the beauty standards it holds for both genders in order to really understand the impacts that objectification has and how we can improve the lives of all through the elimination of unrealistic beauty ideals.

The Art of NOT Being Feminine

The masculine/feminine dichotomy is one that is so ingrained in our society it seems rare that it is ever challenged. But, the most peculiar aspect of this stark difference between gender identities is the idea that being masculine, in part, means NOT being feminine. In fact, being masculine, as our society defines it, often includes putting down women and anyone who is not a heterosexual, masculine man. The implications of this anti-feminine identity are far-reaching and have negative impacts on pretty much anyone that doesn’t embody a hypermasculine identity.

We often wonder why women are disproportionately the victims of interpersonal violence. When we take a closer look at the foundation that men’s core identities lay on, it is not as surprising that men are mostly the perpetrators of violence, and women the victims. From a young age, boys and girls receive different messages about what is acceptable behavior. This starts in schools, where teachers reward aggressive behaviors in boys and reprimand them in girls. Similarly, through adolescence, boys are lifted up and praised for “sexual conquests” while girls are called a “slut” or “whore” for being sexually active. No matter what life stage it is, girls’ actions are viewed negatively compared to the same actions in boys. Even more astonishing is the fact that boys’ rewarded actions often come at the expense of girls’ mental and physical well-being. This, in part, explains why women are disproportionately the victims of violence and men the perpetrators of it. Much of the blame is to fall on society for socializing boys and men to believe that masculinity has to do with not being feminine. We must change the way we think about masculinity in order to save femininity and the women that are victims of our men’s actions, as well as the men who fear straying from the hypermasculine identity. 

Why Don't Men Cry?

Growing up, we are taught that girls are emotional and sensitive, while boys feel no emotion and have a heart of steel. Not until growing up and studying gender studies have I realized how harmful this concept is, which most of our youth are brought up to believe. The concept of the “man box” has jumped out at me throughout this semester’s studies because it finally explains, and labels, why men don’t cry. Not only why they don’t cry, but why they seem to “care less” than women in heterosexual relationships, why people use “gay” as an insult, and why calling a man “weak” is a huge blow to their ego and their identity. 

We can’t say it’s men’s fault that they are hesitant to show their emotions or be anything but hypermasculine and heterosexual. In fact, we have society to blame for that. Starting from a young age, boys are socialized in a way that teaches them that ‘man = strong’. The “man box” incorporates tons of other “masculine” traits, like strength, muscularity, dominance, superiority to women, toughness, and anger. It’s no surprise that when men grow up, they act out these concepts of masculinity that they were taught their whole lives. To make matters worse, men fear breaking out of this stereotypical male identity because they are taught that they will face ridicule from their peers, and even violence, for not conforming. Men have admitted that the fear of straying from the “man box” is what keeps them conforming to masculine stereotypes for much of their lives. 

It’s a sad reality that our men feel pressured to live up to a stereotypically masculine identity because of the forces that tell them they must do so. The fear of ridicule and shame from their peers is often what keeps men adhering to “man box” qualities which only furthers the belief that men must fit those criteria. When will men feel comfortable crying publicly? It’s hard to say, but one thing is for certain: it won’t happen unless society becomes comfortable accepting men for who they really are. 

Some Thoughts on Surviving R. Kelly

We are a product of the way we are brought up, as are our parents and the generations before them. As I am in the midst of the Netflix documentary, ‘Surviving R. Kelly,’ this concept has become relevant, even in relation to celebrities. I specify his role in society because we so often put celebrities on a pedestal that makes them seem invincible, without reminding ourselves that they are simply people, with flaws like the rest of us. Though I have heard bits and pieces of the story, I am just now truly finding out how much of a menace this person is, and my heart goes out to every single individual hurt by his actions, poor choices, and predatory behavior. It is now within my understanding that R. Kelly is, himself, an assault survivor. But trauma does not translate to being an excuse for the ill treatment of others. I think that the most striking piece of this whole scenario is the existing power dynamic between Kelly and the young girls he preyed upon. This is an age old dynamic that is abused over and over again by men in high positions, trading fake promises for sexual acts from underage girls. It is also difficult to stomach all of the red flags that have popped up over the years, such as his marriage to fifteen year old Aaliyah. R&B culture and racialized masculinity met in a way that allowed individuals to turn a blind eye to the situation and make excuses. 

It's for a Friend

I work at an adult retail store and have, especially as of late, been in some very interesting discussions with customers, specifically cisgender men. My job presents itself as a safe space and it is within my duties to assist customers in product selection, which requires some digging on my end to receive that piece of personal information from them. Of course, there is the individual who comes in looking for a gift for a friend, and that ends up being a legitimate motive to their visit. But most of the time, when I am met with that awkwardness and uncertainty, it is clear to see that they are hiding behind this imaginary friend in order to not be judged by my coworkers and myself. In my own experience, this scenario rarely plays out with feminine presenting individuals, and I feel that this says a good deal about our current cultural willingness to let women explore with toys and new ideas (so long as they are not having too many partners – heaven forbid). Meanwhile, men are clearly under the impression that there is shame in experimenting solo/seeking new sensations/traveling away from being focused on penis-in-vagina sexual acts. As someone who, mostly unintentionally, does not have close friendships with cisgender men, this situation initially presented me with a great obstacle as I was not sure of how to properly assist customers falling into this group. It has become a goal of mine to make the men that enter my workplace feel comfortable, free, and unashamed. 

Be a Man, and Make Your Dad Proud

Upon searching for images pertaining to masculinity on different search engines, I stumbled across the attached photo. At first glance, it certainly seems like a harmless image of a father and son bonding, likely in a situation where the son is mimicking the dad as kids often do. But the longer I examined the image, the more it bothered me. Perhaps I am just fundamentally anti-gendering children, or at least projecting gender roles and ideals upon them. But something about equating manliness with muscle mass is outright problematic. I feel strongly that alluding to this idea of brute force aligning with manhood is the root of violence against women, and people in general. By encouraging young boys to flex their muscles, toughen up, and not ‘act like a girl,’ we instill in their young, impressionable minds that a) they must be muscled, strong, ferocious creatures to be real men, and b) that women and/or anyone who does not fit their idea of masculinity should be seen as inherently less valuable. Parents will continue to bring their children up in whatever which way seems appropriate to them, but I do hope individuals will also focus on compassion training and emotional coaching with their kids. Crying, failing, getting hurt, and so on are all part of the human experience, and young boys should not be enforced to tiptoe around those facets of life.

Who gets to decide what a man looks like?

I decided to do a simple google search on the word ‘masculinity’ in order to see what this term represents on a worldwide scale. I stumbled upon this image, and had to stop for a moment to take it in. Something about it makes me uncomfortable. I suppose it is the muscular outline, suggesting that there is a specific body type that exudes masculinity and manliness. That, coupled with the fact that the individual in the photo is already male presenting, wearing a blue button down and sporting a face with thick facial hair, has painted the picture regarding exactly what/who we associate with being manly or masculine. This is troubling for two reasons. First, it sets an expectation for cisgender men to appeal to, and it is likely to take a toll on their psyche if/when they fall short of these often unattainable standards. In this context, we can equate large muscle mass with the cisgender woman’s struggle with maintaining a petite waist. These are looks that some individuals may be inclined toward, but it should certainly not be considered the norm when many people cannot train their bodies to look like that. Second, this image of masculinity can be so harmful to trans individuals, especially those who are beginning transition. To present the idea that this image represents what a man looks like can encourage dysphoria and take away from the validity of a trans man’s experience, if they are to compare themselves unfairly. 

Acceptance

What is the correct practice of teaching acceptance? I believe it starts at a young age and has to be conditioned all throughout ones childhood. As previously mentioned, minding your own business is such an important concept to grasp at. I don't think there is a clear path to teaching the lessons of equality and acceptance however I do believe we owe to future generations to come to not preach bigotry. I think a discussion needs to be had on how to simply not say anything if you don't agree. Not to be completely complacent but in the realm of not being disrespectful if you weren't disrespected to begin with.

Minding the Business that Pays You

I will never understand why people just can't mind the business that pays them. Speaking from a place of experience, so many people were so concerned about my coming out and it had nothing to do with them. So many people had so much to negative stuff to say and majority of which, I had never spoken to or knew. I'm not sure if it has something to do with people feeling as tho they always have to put the underdog down but it was very annoying to know so many people had so much to say about me. I think that we as as society have strayed away from the right to privacy and freedom of expression. It's almost a pain nowadays to be yourself in a public environment and I really wish it wasn't.

Told to Stay Quiet

For as long as I can remember, I've always been told to hush about my feelings. Within the black community, it's very taboo to speak on how one emotionally feels. When doing so, it's seen as a sign of weakness and your masculinity is questioned. What real man cries or shows emotion? You're taught from a young age to be a brick wall, to be seen but not heard. Because of this, I feel as though many black men suffer mentally later in life because they've never been allowed to express themselves.
Childhood trauma is also something that has been swept under the rug. Black families are more likely to turn down stories of abuse before they are to shun the family molester unfortunately and it's been seen in the public eye as well. Monique Hicks, a well known comedian, has suffered in the public as she has let it be known that her brother was her childhood molester. Her family denied it for the longest until a paid interview with Oprah of an undisclosed amount gave him platform to admit his wrong doing. This just goes to show that people are to turn away in the face of negativity. Thoughts?

Life From Both Perspectives

I had come across this video in a previous class. Paula Williams is a transgender woman who lived her whole life as a man knowing she wasn't living her truth. She recognized the differences of how she was treated both a man and after her transition into a woman and it was quite astonishing. I think something that really stuck out to me was her story about the airplane incident. Woman don't get the same level of respect that men do and its quite shameful. This story was a true representation of that. Give the video a watch and let me know your thoughts.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=18&v=lrYx7HaUlMY&feature=emb_logo

4 Year Old & Rainbow Nails

Alicia Keys is a well known artist and a proud activist of the LGBTQ+ community. However most recently, she allowed her son to get rainbow nails at salon. He's only four but his perception of the world is very much alive. He told his mother that he wanted to take them off as soon as he got them because he knew he would be judged by others. This really bothered me because no four year old should have to concern themselves with the opinions of others. He should be allowed to act freely and carelessly because the world should not be looking down on him already. Alicia then went to rant on social media about her frustration as a mother knowing her son is already being judged by the public. The comment section quickly filled with hate comments and it just shows us that there has been no real progression in the age of acceptance. Take a look below, link to the video is attached.
https://www.instagram.com/p/B4q8hydBZT8/?utm_source=ig_web_copy_link